Mortality Risk Adjustment Methodology for University Health System's Clinical Data Base
ثبت نشده
چکیده
for University Health System’s Clinical Data Base The University Health System Consortium (UHC) risk adjusts length of stay (LOS), costs, and mortality in the Clinical Data Base (CDB). Additionally, complications are risk adjusted in the CDB using a complication profiler. The risk adjustment process for LOS, costs and mortality involves four steps: (1) assignment of a Severity of Illness (SOI) and Risk of Mortality (ROM) level to each case; (2) selection of a patient population to serve as the basis of the model to provide norms; (3) use of regression techniques to predict probability of mortality and LOS and costs based on the normative patient population; and (4) assignment of an expected probability of mortality, LOS and costs to every patient in the CDB. (1) Assignment of Severity of Illness and Risk of Mortality Levels Patient characteristics impact resource utilization and clinical outcome greatly. To ensure equitable inter-hospital comparison of outcomes, it is necessary to adjust for differences in patient characteristics. A number of patient classification schemes have been developed to address the issue of patient severity. While each of these schemes defines severity differently, most are similar in one respect: they use specific combinations patient demographics and principal and secondary diagnoses and procedures to define different levels of severity and complexity of treatment. The APR-DRG Grouper, developed by 3M Health Information Systems, is used by UHC to assign a level of illness severity and a risk of mortality level for each patient in the CDB. The APR-DRGs were developed as an expansion of the DRG system to address patient severity of illness and risk of mortality as well as resource intensity. The development process for the APRDRGs involved an iterative process of formulating clinical hypotheses and then testing the hypotheses with historical data. Separate clinical models for severity of illness and risk of
منابع مشابه
Measuring Hospital Performance Using Mortality Rates: An Alternative to the RAMR
Background The risk-adjusted mortality rate (RAMR) is used widely by healthcare agencies to evaluate hospital performance. The RAMR is insensitive to case volume and requires a confidence interval for proper interpretation, which results in a hypothesis testing framework. Unfamiliarity with hypothesis testing can lead to erroneous interpretations by the public and other stakeholders. We argue t...
متن کاملRisk adjustment of health-care performance measures in a multinational register-based study: A pragmatic approach to a complicated topic
OBJECTIVES Health-care performance comparisons across countries are gaining popularity. In such comparisons, the risk adjustment methodology plays a key role for meaningful comparisons. However, comparisons may be complicated by the fact that not all participating countries are allowed to share their data across borders, meaning that only simple methods are easily used for the risk adjustment. ...
متن کاملMethods of Mortality Risk Adjustment in the NICU: A 20-Year Review abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Improving the quality of care delivered in NICUs relies on the ability to partition variation associated with patient characteristics from those attributed to processes of care delivery through risk adjustment. Multiple methods of mortality risk adjustment have been proposed for NICU populations. We review existing literature pertaining to mortality risk adjustment in...
متن کاملThe relationship between hospital volume and mortality in mechanical ventilation: an instrumental variable analysis.
OBJECTIVE To examine the relationship between hospital volume and mortality for nonsurgical patients receiving mechanical ventilation. DATA SOURCES Pennsylvania state discharge records from July 1, 2004, to June 30, 2006, linked to the Pennsylvania Department of Health death records and the 2000 United States Census. STUDY DESIGN We categorized all general acute care hospitals in Pennsylvan...
متن کاملRisk-adjusting outcomes of mental health and substance-related care: a review of the literature.
Risk adjustment is increasingly recognized as crucial to refining health care reimbursement and to comparing provider performance in terms of quality and outcomes of care. Risk adjustment for mental and substance use conditions has lagged behind other areas of medicine, but model development specific to these conditions has accelerated in recent years. After describing outcomes of mental health...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008